Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Power Training
Power Training This is the place to talk about training and racing with power (watts) measuring devices such as Polar 710/720, Power Tap, SRM or any other power measuring device.











Pursuit watts/cda?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61  
Old 09-14.-2010
acoggan acoggan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,833
Rep Power: 53
acoggan has a reputation beyond reputeacoggan has a reputation beyond reputeacoggan has a reputation beyond reputeacoggan has a reputation beyond reputeacoggan has a reputation beyond reputeacoggan has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Pursuit watts/cda?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyFroncioni
Use iAero/iBike.
iAero does tend to "clean up" some Aerolab files, but not ever as much as I'd like. If your out-and-back is straight and almost perfectly aligned with the wind direction, you might get ok results. But how common is that?
Well that depends on where you test, now doesn't it? (I picked my "natural wind tunnel" because it is nicely aligned with the prevailing wind in that immediate vicinity...indeed, it has to be, because it is just that, i.e., a tunnel through the trees.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyFroncioni
3) Use a numerical "zippering" approach for out-and-backs.
Pretend that at every point in an out-and-back, the wind term is (CdA*0.5*RHO*(v-w_i)^2) going out and (CdA*0.5*RHO*(v+w_i)^2) coming back. w_i is the wind at point i.

This way, you could theoretically start from the turn-around point and "zipper" the "out" ve curve with the "back" ve curve, one point at a time. I've attached the out and back file.

Unfortunately, I've not had a lot of luck with this yet.
FWIW, I've been doing essentially as you describe with data from regression tests almost from day 1, and have found that it works quite well as long as the wind is aligned with the test segment as described above.

That said, it is a bit of a moot point, because pure head/tailwinds have little effect on the estimated CdA value, at least if you do runs in each direction.
Reply With Quote




Pursuit watts/cda?







  #62  
Old 09-14.-2010
AndyFroncioni AndyFroncioni is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
AndyFroncioni is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Pursuit watts/cda?

Quote:
Originally Posted by acoggan View Post
Well that depends on where you test, now doesn't it? (I picked my "natural wind tunnel" because it is nicely aligned with the prevailing wind in that immediate vicinity...indeed, it has to be, because it is just that, i.e., a tunnel through the trees.)
Ah, clever. Crap -- I wish I'd thought of that! :-)

Yes, I guess there are a lot of cases where it might be possible to use the natural terrain to "shape" the wind. I find any kind of wind difficult to manage, but my test venues are quite open to wild yaw variations.

Headwinds, btw, tend to give you a virtual elevation that's too high by a factor of:

h = 0.5 * CdA * rho * v * ( v+w)^2 * T / ( m * g ) ,

where
v = ground speed
h = the virtual additional height
w = the headwind
T = time spent riding at the given headwind

Example: CdA = 0.300, rho = 1.2, v = 10 m/s, w = 5 m/s, m = 80kg, T= 10 s

gives us a virtual elevation height of:

h = 1.72m

In other words, 10s into a 5m/s headwind gives you a false virtual elevation of 1.72m.

I've used this with a bad file, some historical wind date, and Google Earth to estimate the CdA for Tony O'Keeffe ( TONY O'KEEFFE - TRIATHLETE - HOME ). I don't have an error estimate for this approach, though. I'm just saying that sometimes, you have to get creative.

Cheers,

Andy
Reply With Quote


  #63  
Old 09-14.-2010
AndyFroncioni AndyFroncioni is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
AndyFroncioni is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Pursuit watts/cda?

Quote:
Originally Posted by acoggan View Post
Well that depends on where you test, now doesn't it? (I picked my "natural wind tunnel" because it is nicely aligned with the prevailing wind in that immediate vicinity...indeed, it has to be, because it is just that, i.e., a tunnel through the trees.)
Ah, clever. Crap -- I wish I'd thought of that! :-)

Yes, I guess there are a lot of cases where it might be possible to use the natural terrain to "shape" the wind. I find any kind of wind difficult to manage, but my test venues are quite open to wild yaw variations.

Headwinds, btw, tend to give you a virtual elevation that's too high by a factor of:

h = 0.5 * CdA * rho * v * ( v+w)^2 * T / ( m * g ) ,

where
v = ground speed
h = the virtual additional height
w = the headwind
T = time spent riding at the given headwind

Example: CdA = 0.300, rho = 1.2, v = 10 m/s, w = 5 m/s, m = 80kg, T= 10 s

gives us a virtual elevation height of:

h = 1.72m

In other words, 10s into a 5m/s headwind gives you a false virtual elevation of 1.72m.

I've used this with a bad file, some historical wind data, and Google Earth to estimate the CdA for Tony O'Keeffe ( TONY O'KEEFFE - TRIATHLETE - HOME ). I don't have an error estimate for this approach, though. I'm just saying that sometimes, you have to get creative.

Cheers,

Andy
andyfroncioni.com

Last edited by AndyFroncioni; 09-14.-2010 at 10:49 PM.
Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
pursuit, watts or cda

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 



Preferred Vendors



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 AM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com